Seven Sixes are Forty Three

I got this book from my colleagues, as a parting gift. I was leaving that firm and guys wanted to give me something I like, so, another book. Seven 6s are 43 is a translation of “Saat Sakkam Trechalis”, a marathi novel. Author Kiran Nagarkar is a ‘Sahitya Academy’ Award winner. Translation was done by Subha Slee. It’s an old book actually, first published in 1974. I started reading this, when I boarded in flight for my home and finished it when I came back from home, so, I can term it as a travel book.

The book, itself tells the story of a character Kushank’s journey through life. When I started, I found this novel a little bit vague, abruptly starting, breaking abruptly in between. Author talking about one part of life suddenly jumps to another incident, completely different and thus story appears confusing as a life can be. I didn’t like till I had finished a large portion, say almost 100 pages. After that I had enough idea about the character, so even the hoping of stories didn’t led me to ashtray and I was not able to take it off without finishing the tale.

I remember, a boy in “Catcher in The Rye” by J D Salinger, who starts speaking on one topic but keep on fleeting on different topics, I guess Kiran Nagarkar was that guy. He has, in just one go grasped so many topics that I find it hard to just list them out. Main character, a middle class Indian, going through his memory lane, childhood, college, job struggle, making and breaking of love relationships, growing old, loneliness, loosing loved ones, separation, life, death, struggle to keep himself sane, struggle of villagers to survive, searching water, fighting against a rich landowner, rebellion, Indian caste system and many things which are hard to list down. In simple, its journey of a floating mind through memory lane, ending with a great satire on religious hooliganism of Indians.

Novel, though a little bit vague, have everything you can munch on. It’s more of a ride, in which you take the first turn which fancies you; you ride not for any particular aim but for the wonder of travel. A directionless travel, rough patches, green patches, changing seasons, passing time, growing, suffering, friends, departing, love, aloof, alone, dragging, running, but you never stop for a breather, you keep on riding.

One stupid thing, I found on its back page. There was a comment from “Times of India” that author have excellent eye for finding humor in anything, be it fight against rich, death or intercourse. These are not exact words but the comment gave me a view that author writes like ‘Salman Rushdie’, adding sexual intercourse to spice up the story, or may be a satire on Indian society with loads of humor. This was a most foolish comment anybody can give to this novel. It’s hardly humorous, though a little satirical, no comparison with Rushdie’s sex enriched novels.

List of my books

That's not all I have, some are still resting at my home and are not currently with me, also I have lost two out of these.Little bit explaination of notations, I have used:
Genre:
Make me Laugh- Humour, comedy
Somethings to Know- Science, general knowledge or anything interesting to know about
Lessons from life- General life philosophy, biographies, about some person's life, quotes
Imaginary Worlds- Pure fiction, it includes sci-fi
Magic, Dreamland, Grandma's Tales- Fantasy, stories for kids
Everlasting Greats- Classic, it may be fiction, crime, fantasy or poetry, whatever known as great work of literature
Sky is Beautiful- Astronomy, cosmology
Evolving Apes- Anthropology, discussing about human evolution
Numbers Magic- Related to maths
Doing Business- Business related, business history, marketing, strategy
Talk to Me- Communication related, language, etiquettes
Status:
Read in Peace- Have read it
Giving Eggs- Still, not have read
Half Munched- Read it partially, still need to finish
On The Roll- Reading now
Gone with the _____- Lended to someone, with not so bright hopes of getting back soon
Lost Forever- Lended to someone with no hope of return :(

Got it :)

I finally was able get my hands on the selfish genes. Though my body carries innumerous of these but here I am talking about the book 'The Selfish Genes' by Richard Dawkins, which I mentioned in one of my previous post. As a bonus, I also got Feynman Lectures on Physics, all four parts in audio cds.
Though, I will start going through these only after I complete reading the book "Don't you have time to think", by R P Feynman (edited by his daughter, Michelle Feynman). This book is like a break from what all I was reading. This book is a collection of letters written by RP Feynman and if you know RPF's character, these letters contains all his fingerprints. Soem are funny, some serious, some shows an idealist and some shows an emotional being. Collection starts from his college life, letter to mom, his first marriage, atomic bomb, death of wife, death of father, quantum physics, freshman lectures, nobel accolade, then confrontation with authorities. Most fascinating was his comment on love of science, looking a beautiful flower and trying to soak up with nature's little wonder with unfathomable curiosity, wondering and trying to cipher the nature's ways.

Arctic fossils mark move to land

This news was really as part of showing complete progress of fishes evolving in to land animals.

Fossil animals found in Arctic Canada provide a snapshot of fish evolving into land animals, scientists say.
The finds are giving researchers a fascinating insight into this key stage in the evolution of life on Earth.
US palaeontologists have published details of the fossil "missing links" in the prestigious journal Nature.
The 383 million-year-old specimens are described as crocodile-like animals with fins instead of limbs that probably lived in shallow water.

More details here. More links to this story, TIME, Nature, Guardian & NYT.

'The Selfish Genes'

Just read about this book, 'The Selfish Genes' by Richard Dawkins. Now, I have to find it and read it fast. This is just for keep on reminding me about this book.

Here, came the conquerors

Agriculture was accompanied by domestication of animals. Animals helped, not only in ploughing but also provided milk, wool, skin and other products which were treated by early humans as luxury. It can be argued that domestication of milk giving animals preceded agriculture as there is no clear differentiation. But this can be pointed out that domestication of milk giving animals started in the areas where agriculture was tough or non-existent. Animals were already been domesticated for their meat but as humans realized that they can also get milk from these animals, they started keeping these animals at one place. Pigs and fowls were the first animals to be domesticated for meat. Goats followed with cows and buffalos. Horses, camels and elephants were late entrants. But before all these, dogs were the first animals which were domesticated for help in hunting. Dogs were the natural partners to humans as hunter. Cats and other pet animals became habitual to living with humans very late. Cats, as one of the best hunters, initially scarred humans as they were competitors in hunting and became part of many legends. Other animals also had their share of mystrey. Small cats became as for their stealthy nature were good at stealing food from human storages. Initial food storage also faces the problems of rats and small pests. It is argued that agriculture evolved rapidly only when humans had discovered to store grains in closed tanks or containers.
Domestication of horses was one of the biggest factors which transformed early human society completely. Before horses, human were dependent on only their legs for transportation. As for biological constraints, it limited human group's movements and thus limited interactions between different societies. In the circumstances, most of the human societies developed independently and had completely distinct beliefs, customs, social structure and culture. Competitions between adjoining societies were common but this struggle never spread to a particular region, limited by geographical boundaries. Natural habitat for horses is grass plains and they lived in herds. Humans most probably also used to hunt them but might have soon realized that they could also ride them. Domestication of horses had taken a long time as these animals are not so tame like pigs or cows. Also, riding a horse requires certain skills which also had taken a long time to develop. Once the humans were on top of horses, they started spreading rapidly. First human society which domesticated horses is known as 'Aryans'.
Aryans were mainly hunters and used to have huge herds of cows with them for food. Cow was considered sacred as they used to drink cow's milk which was compared to mother's milk. They used to do their most of the property transaction in means of either cows or horses. They were wanderers and kept moving. As being good hunters, they were also great warriors. With the added advantage of fast riding horses, 'Aryans' dominated most of the other societies whom they came in contact. At the time of 'Aryans', agriculture had transformed other societies and there were many human settlements. Aryans in their ride trounced these societies and destroyed their settlement. Commonalities between most of the languages of Asia and Europe are evidence of Aryans' dominance in their time. When Aryans started their victory march, there were many well developed societies existing, like in India, Sumer, Egypt and Mesopotamia. Chinese society was guarded by high Himalayan peaks thus didn't come in the influence of Aryan invasion. India was the first one to face Aryan’s onslaught. Aryans pushed aboriginal Indians further in Indian peninsula and destroyed their cities. Aryans then moved to west and slowly reached Mesopotamia and Sumer. Sumer was razed and Mesopotamia survived with little remains. Egyptians also faced Aryan brunt and were pushed westwards. Aryans then moved north and dissipated. Influence of Aryan society was so strong that even after many years; these regions were occupied with wars and brutal destruction.

The mating game

I am going through this book now; "The mating game" by John Gribbin and Jeremy Cherfas. Author explains that why humans have two sexes and why sexual reproduction is advantageous to asexual reproduction. Nature has given us large brains and shared its own power of selection with us. Darwin suggested a theory of sexual selection after his all famous theory of natural selection. Sexual selection theory, appears to be a subset of the grand natural selection process. Sexual selection just give humans little bit more control over their biological destiny. Survivors will be the ones whom people love. I, initially put this last sentance as "survivors will be the ones whom girls love" but then realised that whats true for boys selection its the boys for selecting girls. So, both sexes choose better attributes in opposite sexes and mate to produce offsprings which have desired characterstics. If it has been just one sex, nature would have been only criteria to discard disadvantageous features. Nature built its toys such that these toys filter out any disadvantageous features in themselves and keep on surviving.
Here, this system also have some deficiencies, human mind doesn't always think rationally and true to our ignorance we have hard time in differentiating our natural instincts and fantasies. Giving in to your instincts is submitting to nature but humans are built in such to tough competitor. First time, I think we share the "Nature's Grandeur", if only if..!!!